• The dates from the oldest articles (probably 2005 and earlier) are likely wrong, as they were ported from a still-older content management system.

  • Articles do not show the article time at the moment, but I've been internally nothing date-unknown articles by giving them a timestamp of 00:00.
  • Just as this "five things" process exists, I had an earlier series of notes tracking a still-earlier porting process. In due time, I'll go through that list and correct dates as best I can.

833 articles left to process..

• The dates from the oldest articles (probably 2005 and earlier) are likely wrong, as they were ported from a still-older content management system.

  • Articles do not show the article time at the moment, but I've been internally nothing date-unknown articles by giving them a timestamp of 00:00.
  • Just as this "five things" process exists, I had an earlier series of notes tracking a still-earlier porting process. In due time, I'll go through that list and correct dates as best I can.

835 articles left to process..

• The dates from the oldest articles (probably 2005 and earlier) are likely wrong, as they were ported from a still-older content management system.

  • Articles do not show the article time at the moment, but I've been internally nothing date-unknown articles by giving them a timestamp of 00:00.
  • Just as this "five things" process exists, I had an earlier series of notes tracking a still-earlier porting process. In due time, I'll go through that list and correct dates as best I can.

839 articles left to process..

• The dates from the oldest articles (probably 2005 and earlier) are likely wrong, as they were ported from a still-older content management system.

  • Articles do not show the article time at the moment, but I've been internally nothing date-unknown articles by giving them a timestamp of 00:00.
  • Just as this "five things" process exists, I had an earlier series of notes tracking a still-earlier porting process. In due time, I'll go through that list and correct dates as best I can.

852 articles left to process..

• The dates from the oldest articles (probably 2005 and earlier) are likely wrong, as they were ported from a still-older content management system.

  • Articles do not show the article time at the moment, but I've been internally nothing date-unknown articles by giving them a timestamp of 00:00.
  • Just as this "five things" process exists, I had an earlier series of notes tracking a still-earlier porting process. In due time, I'll go through that list and correct dates as best I can.

897 articles left to process..

• The dates from the oldest articles (probably 2005 and earlier) are likely wrong, as they were ported from a still-older content management system.

  • Articles do not show the article time at the moment, but I've been internally nothing date-unknown articles by giving them a timestamp of 00:00.
  • Just as this "five things" process exists, I had an earlier series of notes tracking a still-earlier porting process. In due time, I'll go through that list and correct dates as best I can.

915 articles left to process..

• Ported articles are given a timestamp of 00:00.

• The dates from the oldest articles (2005 or so) are likely wrong, as they were ported from a still-older content management system.

  • Just as this "five things" process exists, I had an earlier series of notes tracking a still-earlier porting process. In due time, I'll go through that list and correct dates as best I can.

924 articles left to process..

• Ported articles are given a timestamp of 00:00.

• The dates from the oldest articles (2005 or so) are likely wrong, as they were ported from a still-older content management system.

  • Just as this "five things" process exists, I had an earlier series of notes tracking a still-earlier porting process. In due time, I'll go through that list and correct dates as best I can.

926 articles left to process..