![]() |
Wiki >
See also:
Table of Contents [hide]
Wiki pros and cons ∞
-
Anyone can edit without logging in.
- Spamming is serious problem. See MediaWiki spam protection
- Ne’er-do-wells are a serious problem; when you have anonymity, you will have assholes. See MediaWiki security.
-
Edits are fast and easy.
- Spamming, trolling and graffiti are fast and easy.
- Fix broken links, spelling, and add insightful comments.
- See also Zuihitsu.
-
The system is democratic down to individuals.
- Moderation is absent.
-
Editable with any web browser
- Therefore cross-platform.
- Even JavaScript is not usually necessary.
-
A user-friendly markup language.
- However markup languages vary per-wiki, making advanced usage inobvious.
-
The ease of page creation leads to a proliferation of pages.
-
The layout / structure are entirely in the control of the primary editors
- The layer / structure must be defined and defended manually.
- Without enforceable rules, a wiki becomes mob-rule; goals and mission statements are not inevitable.
-
The ease of submitting partial articles and thoughts creates a maintenance burden.
- Some submissions would require refactoring (heavily-editing) an article to fully integrate changes for an overall good read.
- People have differences in opinion and style, and will frequently feud over pages, paragraphs or even single words.
- Most visitors are passive consumers and won’t participate in the wiki concept; they will view a page like a single article which is badly written by a single author.
-
There is no editor vetting process, and expertise is disregarded (perhaps even with prejudice!).
Notes ∞
- Why Wiki Works [ 1 ]
- Why Wiki Works Not [ 2 ]
- On Wikis And Security [ 3 ]
- Soft Security [ 4 ]
-
Community Solutions [ 5 ]


– ported, but rewritten.
– date estimated — this article is much older.