It's a play on words

Entertainment > Movies >

(on Wikipedia)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2884206/
https://www.searchlightpictures.com/iorigins/ [ 1 ]

A science guy has a thing for eyes.

Has one long mellow semi-suspenseful tone, but doesn’t take full advantage of its opportunities. It grows weaker and weaker as it drones on, and barely pretends to have a reasonable resolution.

• 2017-08-05

• Watched before; no notes were taken.

2017-08-05 ∞

• 1:00 — I think I’ve seen this before.. maybe I saw a trailer.
• 1:15 — http://www.digitalsoulbank.com (not archived)
• 2:00 — I’m positive I’ve seen this.
• 3:30 — Is she horribly scarred?
• 4:15 — He’s creepy as hell, but then again so is she.
• 6:30 — That seems completely safe.
• 6:45 — “.. but continuous consent is hot.”
• 8:45 — Oh I know her.
• 13:00 — I should have been noting all the technical terms.. but I won’t.
• 23:15 — The debate was ended a long time ago, wasn’t it?
• 23:45 — Her pendant is the Eye of Horus.
• 28:00 — What? Exactly how much time has passed? Rushing much?
• 33:00 — What? Exactly how much time has passed? Rushing much?
• 35:45 — Big Bang
• 42:15 — Don’t.. don’t they have hospitals?
• 50:30 — He’s under the influence, therefore she’s raping him.
• 51:00 — 7 years later.
• 56:45 — It was a traumatic experience for him, and the perfume etc.. he has quite a good explanation.
• 59:15 — This is creepy as all fuck. Also, it’s trivial to guess the baby will have her eyes.

• 1:01:30 — Autism

  • Your genetics are busted (when combined). Make this your only child.
• 1:08:00 — She knows all that. She has the background in all of that because she’s been working with such things and with a guy who has moderate experience with them. He already said he’s been working with that tech for a decade.
• 1:10:00 — Or that woman had access, and forged things.
• 1:17:45 — All this time they never looked into the woman doing the experiment on their child?
• 1:25:30 — He answered with “hello”, perhaps that is a good sign that the caller should speak English.
• 1:27:45 — So if this isn’t a god of the gaps argument, but a miracle of some sort, then it would have to be reproducible and testable, and would need multiple witnesses in a shared reality. One person’s unexplained thing doesn’t mean a damn.
• 1:33:00 — Those were the Skype call-ring/answer sounds. Followed by that is the hangup sound.
• 1:35:45 — They shouldn’t be talking about correct/incorrect, just recording data points.
• 1:38:45 — That sound didn’t seem right. I can’t place where it’s from though.
• 1:39:00 — The entire little girl being taken to his hotel room seems rather odd. She should have been brought to the community center.

• 1:40:30 — Okay. And? So?

  • The elevator should crash down or something.

• 1:42:30 — And? Can I have a resolution?

Footnotes

1. was www.foxsearchlight.com/iorigins/ [ ↩ ]