 |
Entertainment > Movies >
(on Wikipedia)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094154/
A scientist from the future goes back in time to do (stuff that I wasn’t paying attention enough to figure out), but his assistant’s daughter goes back to stop him with the help of one of the grandfather’s of time travel.
For an old TV-movie this is pretty good.
The actual movie is copyright 1986.
 |
Entertainment > Movies >
(on Wikipedia)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092086/
Three movie stars, mistaken for the heroes they portray, are lead to Mexico to protect townsfolk.
Maybe this was good in the context in which it was made, but god damn is it awful now.
See also Seven Samurai – (1954 movie)
 |
Entertainment > Movies >
Star Wars >
(on Wikipedia)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3748528/
https://www.starwars.com/films/rogue-one
Something something father something reactor something plans to the death star something hope.
A pretty terrible episode. I’m not going to bother watching another of these..
AKA Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, because fuck sensible naming.
 |
Entertainment > Movies / Hackers >
(on Wikipedia)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3268458/
See https://participant.com/?s=the+internet%27s+own
A documentary on Aaron Swartz and some of the major events he participated in.
was itunes.apple.com/us/movie/the-internets-own-boy/id880571554
 |
Entertainment > Movies >
(on Wikipedia)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1046173/
Newly-developed military nano-technology is stolen by terrorists in a plot to take over the world, and only a super-elite team chosen from the international best can stop them.
This movie is another example of both an astonishingly wide gap between its original audience and current audience, and a needless unimagination in original movie universe-building authorship.
 |
Entertainment > Movies >
(on Wikipedia)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119654/
to re-watch
#1 in the Men in Black franchise
 |
Entertainment > Movies >
(on Wikipedia)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0190332/
(archived website)
coming later
 |
Entertainment > Movies >
(on Wikipedia)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1405809/
A woman in a wheelchair goes on vacation alongside various religious tourists.
I couldn’t get to the half-way point without succumbing to boredom. This movie has a kind of absence of flavour that drones on like one unwavering tone. I don’t know how the hell this movie got into my inbox, perhaps as a reality-questioning movie. Maybe it got into interesting things later, but I was unwilling to give it that chance.
It had no explosions or lasers.
 |
Entertainment > Movies >
(on Wikipedia)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0300902/
In a world where everyone must take a daily suppressant to survive a deadly plague, one cop is put on the case of a string of murders targeting its researchers.
As usual, Christopher Lambert is a terrible actor. I just realized he’s another Keanu Reeves, where if you like the guy you’ll be just fine.. and you’ll also know how each of his characters will look and feel.
Kelly Brook is a work of art.
Released 2003-12-16
 |
Entertainment > Movies >
(on Wikipedia)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3183660/
https://www.fantasticbeasts.com/
A British wizard travels to New York City, but his case full of endangered magical creatures causes trouble in a city that already has its own creature problem.
Weak characters, a shit plot with lots of filler and generally unlikeable. Especially bad in light of the earlier movies set in this universe. God that main character is fucking terrible to watch.
I will forever misremember this title as Fantastic Breasts and Where to Find Them. No fantastic breasts were found in this movie.
Avoid, especially if you like the Harry Potter series!
Based on Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them – (2001 book), by “Newt Scamander” (J. K. Rowling)
